by Poshgill » Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:28 pm
Well, back to trying to write the same post that I attempted earlier............
Rob, I spoke to a mate today that was in the mob at the time of the miners dispute. He confirmed most definitely that some Army lads were deployed as covert Police officers. Special forces mainly and used as Agent Provocateurs to stir up trouble. He knows some of them personally. And they were based at Hereford at the time! They never wore collar numbers unlike regular bobbies. What you have to remember, the miners strike was the first political strike that was taken on by the Govt. Yes, we all know that the Labour Govt of the 70s were cosy with the trade unions at the time as they were the major contributors to the Labour Party (much like the Tories were cosy with the CBI) but Labour generally refused to get involved in industrial disputes, preferring to leave it to the Management to sort (with the exception of Barbara Castle getting involved with the striking women at Ford's, but that was more about equal opportunities). Thatcher had 2 things on her agenda. Smash the miners, because the Tories blamed them for the 3 day working week which ultimately brought down the Heath regime (The fact that his economic policies were a disaster with inflation running at almost 20% is lost in the mists of time) and Trade Union reform. Scargill played right into her hands. As I said earlier. 2 very similar characters that was always going to lead to a clash as both were too arrogant to reach a compromise. The irony is, that the only reason the Thatcher Govt could tackle the miners was because the country had just started to be become economically sufficient as North Sea Oil was generating income. The fact that the Govt was financially secure for the first time since before the war was as a result of the previous (and much maligned) Labour Govt taking the radical step to Nationalise North Sea Oil. A decision taken by, of all people, Tony Benn.
As for your post from FB comparing Socialism with High School grades. Well, I am surprised at a man as intelligent as you bothering with such clap-trap. It is a typical American load of old bull to simplify something so that their tiny minds can understand the concept. (BTW, Rimshot never accused you of being a Daily Mail reader, he simply stated that it is the sort of trite rubbish that would have a Mail reader nodding in agreement!)
Grades are given on ability. Not effort or desire. In life, some people are more fortunate than others. Some people, despite working hard, just do not possess the ability that others may. Some work hard and get lucky breaks, some people, through no fault of their own never get the breaks in life and just get dealt a bum hand and some people just do not have the ability to raise themselves to another level. Now, I would say that you, Rimshot and myself have done quite well for ourselves in our chosen careers. A lot of that is hard work but there is also a degree of fortune along the way. It is our responsibility to help those less fortunate than us in Society. The best way we can do that is by paying a little more back into Society (via the tax system). We do this to help those that are not able to have the fortune we have. This is the basis of Socialism. To create a better society for all, not just the privileged few. This is what separates us from the animals and, as a Christian, I'm sure you would agree, is the fundamental principle of Christianity.